Difference between Gagik Tsarukyan and Arthur Baghdasaryan (video)
Publicist, analyst, former member of “Heritage” party Karine Hakobyan also attended the first meeting of “Armenian Renaissance” social-political union. Mrs. Hakobyan assured that she supports social unions over good goals, “We must do everything for new generation. I am not a member of the Rule of Law Party (OEK): publicist, analyst can be useful in his sphere. The projects of the NGOs and parties very often coincide: the initiatives of the NGOs can be implemented through the parties. In this case the OEK can be the political implementer of the particular projects. As a former partisan Mrs. Hakobyan supports the unification of parties, “In general I support the division between the opposition and the authorities, and the clearer that line is, the more united the opposition parties are and the more jointly they act and control the authorities, the more our society will benefit.” Won’t the OEK leader Arthur Baghdasaryan disappoint the society once again as former BHK leader Gagik Tsarukyan did, Karine Hakobyan is sure- no, “Gagik Tsarukyan presented the interests of big business, which operates in the field, which isn’t reliable. No representative of big business can be in big politics. Arthur Baghdasaryan also has businesses, but they aren’t big, he is a political-state figure. They also have personal differences.” Mrs. Hakobyan thinks that the fault is in our state system, which allows the representatives of big business to be engaged in politics.
