THE VERDICT WILL BE APPEALED AGAINST
Support A1+!”Like the First Instance Court the Review one didn’t produce any proof which might substantiate Edik Grigoryan’s actions. All of them are grounded on the assumptions. The circumstances were commented on harmful to my client”, advocate Karapet Aghajanyan announced after the verdict had been published.
He is going to put an application to the Appeal Court Chamber of Criminal and Military Cases. Marusia Chilingaryan, the advocate of defendants Ashot Knyazyan and Hamlet Stepanyan, is intended to appeal against the verdict, too.
”How can one bring in the same verdict to Nairi Hunanyan and Ashot Knyazyan? What does it mean to block the road? How could he do that? An army arrived and closed it. It’s just a shame to say so”, Mrs Chilingaryan who got to Court after the verdict publication was blaming in the corridor.
The advocate was more upset by the fact that the Review Court had considered defendant Knyazyan as the member of the criminal band.
